EQ

1. "I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ."

2. a) This question does follow the rule of three because it does require research and it isn't a yes or no question. It does give a chance to argue because there can be many answers. The wording also makes sense and is understandable.
    b) This question does not follow the rule of three because it needs to specify what the conviction is, and without knowing you can't do much research on it.
    c) This question does follow the rule of three because it does require research and is not a yes or no answer. There are many answers so it can be arguable. The wording is good so it makes complete sense.
    d)  This question does not follow the rule of three because it doesn't specify what kind of chronic pain or where it is. This question does make sense but it needs to be more specific.

3. What is the best way for municipalities to prevent storm water pollution?