November extra post

This was an easy month, I mostly just read Stormwater magazines ans helped my dad with some paperwork.

EQ

1. "I reviewed the rule of three for writing an EQ."

2. a) This question does follow the rule of three because it does require research and it isn't a yes or no question. It does give a chance to argue because there can be many answers. The wording also makes sense and is understandable.
    b) This question does not follow the rule of three because it needs to specify what the conviction is, and without knowing you can't do much research on it.
    c) This question does follow the rule of three because it does require research and is not a yes or no answer. There are many answers so it can be arguable. The wording is good so it makes complete sense.
    d)  This question does not follow the rule of three because it doesn't specify what kind of chronic pain or where it is. This question does make sense but it needs to be more specific.

3. What is the best way for municipalities to prevent storm water pollution?

October Extra Post

On the 18 of October I went to an event with my mentor and talked and educated the public about storm water and told them what to do to help out. To do this I played a game of Jeopardy with them, They got to choose three questions and if they got at least two right then they won a prize. We designed the game to get people thinking about storm water and hopefully they learned something and will care.

Blog 9: Lesson 1 Reflection

1. I am really proud of how my presentation played out, although I had a little technical trouble I thought I did really well.

2. A.) I would give myself a P
    B.) I think I deserve that because I met all of the requirement that were on the contract and did not miss anything.

3. Being prepared really worked out for me, I knew what to say and what to do and it all flowed really well.

4. I would have done a regular slide show presentation instead of a prezi because the computer was not cooperating with prezi.